mattersverymuch: (ɂ that come & have a go with me)
the marquis de Carabas ([personal profile] mattersverymuch) wrote 2013-11-06 03:40 am (UTC)

Private;

. . . There's worse reasoning.

[If it's the case that whoever goes through will reach the bridge, will become the Admiral, or will face them - Nathan is steady. It's a place to start.]

[And what if it isn't what you want it to be? he thinks, but doesn't say.]


You need little directive. I'll leave you to it.

[And then a mark of hesitation, an intake of breath, a slight sideways motion of his eyes, of attention.]

If you endanger the safety of the inmates on this ship in any way, whether through negligence or deliberate malice, you'll be disposed of.

[Saying inmates is easier than naming names. Certainly easier than saying friends.]

I don't anticipate that this will be a problem. But I felt that in the interests of full disclosure, that fact should be shared.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting